Best AI SEO Services in 2026 (AI-Powered SEO Agencies Compared)

Almost every SEO agency now says it uses AI. At one end is a team that runs research through its own software, drafts with AI and has a senior editor approve every page. At the other is the old process with a writing tool added, or a software vendor that hands the work back to your staff.

This guide ranks eight AI SEO services on how AI is built into their SEO work: research, production, automation and quality control, for Google and AI search together. It is written for marketing heads at companies with existing demand who want an outside team to run search with AI doing the heavy lifting. Each entry draws on the provider’s own pages, checked in November 2026, and prices are list prices.

It is not for teams that only want to be cited in ChatGPT and Perplexity and care little about Google, or for very early startups, which are better served by a freelancer than a retainer.

Summary

• “AI SEO” means two things: using AI inside the SEO process, and optimizing for AI answers. This guide judges agencies mainly on the first, across both Google and AI search.
• Our ranking: 1. Reach AI, 2. Siege Media, 3. Breaking B2B, 4. Graphite, 5. Radyant, 6. Known, 7. GrowthX, 8. AirOps.
• The useful question is who reviews AI output before it ships. Google says AI content must be fact-checked and reviewed by hand, and treats mass-produced pages with no added value as spam.
• Only three list a price: Reach AI ($8,000 a month), Breaking B2B (from $4,600 a month) and Radyant (from €7,000 a month). AirOps publishes a free software tier but no services price.
• GrowthX and AirOps are software platforms with expert help attached. They suit teams with content staff, and leave more of the work with you.
• Every case-study figure in this guide is reported by the provider itself.

1. What AI SEO services are

An AI SEO service is an SEO provider that uses AI to do part of the work: research, briefs, drafts, content refreshes, monitoring and reporting. The good ones keep people in charge of the decisions and the final check. The term is also used for optimizing a brand’s presence in AI answers (often called AEO, answer engine optimization, or GEO, generative engine optimization). Most providers here do both, and the two overlap: the pages and mentions that help a brand on Google are often the ones AI assistants quote.

This guide looks mainly at the first meaning, where providers differ most and buyers can check claims.

Where AI does useful work in SEO

• Research at volume: clustering large keyword and prompt sets, and mining sales calls, reviews and forums for buyer questions.
• Briefs and drafts: outlines and first drafts built from that research and a brand knowledge base.
• Refreshes: flagging stale pages and proposing updates.
• Monitoring: tracking rankings and AI answers, and the sources each answer cites.
• Quality checks: grading drafts against their target question before a person reviews them.

Three kinds of provider

Services firms with their own tools (Reach AI, Siege Media, Graphite, Radyant, Known) do the work for you. A services firm that does not describe its AI use (Breaking B2B) sells AI search without saying how AI fits its own process. Software platforms with services attached (GrowthX, AirOps) sell a product your team operates, with experts on top.

Getting cited by assistants is its own discipline; the complete guide to AI search visibility covers it.

2. Why the AI in the process matters

Two facts shape this market. Buyers now research in AI chatbots as well as Google. In a G2 survey of 1,076 B2B software buyers in March 2026, 51% said they start research with an AI chatbot more often than with Google, and 71% said they rely on chatbots at some point in their research.¹1 Source: G2, “In the Answer Economy, Don’t Win the Click, Win the Answer”, accessed Nov 2026. Survey of 1,076 B2B software buyers, March 2026. That doubles the surface an SEO program covers, and the research load. Doing it by hand is slow, which is the honest case for AI in the process.

The second fact is the risk. Google’s guidance says generative AI can help when researching a topic, but that “it is critical to manually factcheck and review all AI-generated content,” including titles, meta descriptions and structured data.²2 Source: Google Search Central, “Google Search’s guidance on using generative AI content on your website”, accessed Nov 2026. Its spam policies name “using generative AI tools or other similar tools to generate many pages without adding value for users” among the forms of scaled content abuse.³3 Source: Google Search Central, “Spam policies for Google web search”, accessed Nov 2026. Shipping unchecked AI drafts in bulk puts your domain on the line.

3. Ranking criteria

We ranked the eight providers on seven criteria, weighted from first to last, using only what each says on its own site:

1. How AI fits the daily work. Does the provider name the jobs its software does, and is the software its own?
2. Expert review of AI output. Does a named role check output before it ships, and does the client approve it?
3. Google and AI search in one plan. One team, with tracking for both.
4. Prompt research grounded in demand. Buyer questions from sales calls, reviews and communities, plus search data.
5. Search focus. Search as the main business, not one line in a full-service menu.
6. Execution beyond content. Technical fixes, links, mentions and community work inside the retainer.
7. Revenue reporting and terms. Pipeline or revenue reporting, published prices, short minimum terms.

No provider tops all seven. No provider was hired or tested for this guide; the ranking compares public commitments only. Case-study figures are the providers’ own and were not independently verified.

4. The best AI SEO services at a glance

#	Provider	Type	Best for	How AI is used in the work	Starting list price, Nov 2026
1	Reach AI	Services, own AI platform	Companies past $5M revenue that want one team on Google and AI search	ReachOS clusters keyword and prompt data; experts plan, build and review every piece	$8,000/mo
2	Siege Media	Services, own AI tools	Established brands with large content and digital PR needs	BlueprintIQ generates briefs; strategists QA and refine them	Not published
3	Breaking B2B	Services	B2B SaaS that wants published tiers and YouTube or Reddit work	Not described on its site	From $4,600/mo, 12-month term
4	Graphite	Services, research team	Enterprise and mid-market brands that want research behind each call	AI research team; tool data plus manual tracking of money prompts	Not published
5	Radyant	Services, own platform	European SaaS and B2B with attribution needs	Radyant Cockpit, a context layer and pre-publish checks	From €7,000/mo, 12-month term
6	Known	Services, own software	Teams that want Google, AI answers and third-party sites as one market	Experts supported by in-house software and data	Not published
7	GrowthX	Platform plus experts	B2B software firms with content staff	Agents write briefs and drafts with built-in grading	Not published
8	AirOps	Platform plus services	In-house content teams that want software first	Quill agent, workflows and Offsite, with optional services	Free Solo plan; Pro and services not published

Sources: each provider’s homepage, service and pricing pages, cited in the entries below.

5. The eight providers in detail

1. Reach AI

Reach AI runs SEO and AI search for clients from offices in Lisbon and New York. It calls itself an “AI-native team” and covers Google plus AI answers in ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and Google AI Overviews.⁴4 Reach AI, homepage FAQ (usereach.ai), accessed Oct 2026. Company statements, including contract terms; the pricing page FAQ did not display its answer on contract length when rechecked in November. Its services run from research to pages it publishes to the client’s CMS, technical audits, link and mention placements, Reddit, Quora and G2 answers, and CRM attribution.⁴

What makes it relevant here is how plainly it splits the work. ReachOS, its own AI platform, mines buyer intent from sales calls, reviews, community threads and search and AI-engine autocompletes, and turns “hundreds of thousands of keyword and prompt variations” into intent clusters, each with a brief.⁵5 Reach AI, homepage (usereach.ai), accessed Nov 2026. Company statements. Experts turn those clusters into a roadmap revised weekly on what converts, then build the pages, fixes, mentions and community answers. Reach says accounts get a lead AI search strategist and senior specialists, with no juniors.⁴

On its results page, Reach credits the program with $506K in signed contract value and 7.3x organic traffic in four months for ColdIQ, a go-to-market agency, and a 1,318.62% year-over-year rise in AI-search-attributed revenue over five months for Indie Campers, a campervan marketplace.⁶6 Reach AI, “Customer Results” (usereach.ai/customer-results), accessed Oct 2026. Results reported by the company, not independently verified.

AI and review: software does the research and clustering; people do the rest. The homepage says “an expert reviews every piece before it ships,” and the pricing page says the client signs off on strategy before execution starts.⁵⁷7 Reach AI, “Pricing” (usereach.ai/pricing), accessed Nov 2026. List prices, according to the company.

Ideal for: businesses above $5 million in yearly revenue whose marketing team is small, in sectors such as B2B software, fintech, ecommerce and marketplaces.⁴

Strengths: a clearly described split between platform and people; one team from research to community work; published prices and output per tier; strict and influenced attribution; pages going live from week 3, by its own timeline.⁴⁷

Limits: at $8,000 a month with a three-month minimum, it is priced above what small companies and early startups can carry; ReachOS is described only in general terms, with no public detail on its outputs or whether clients get access; local search and Google Business Profile work are not on the list; the firm is younger than Siege Media or Graphite; every result is self-reported.⁵⁴⁶

Price: two tiers. Core Engine is $8,000 a month for 10 pages, 6 placements, 5 community engagements and 100 tracked prompts, with a call every other week. Hardcore Mode is $15,000 a month for 25 pages, 20 placements, 15 or more engagements and 250 prompts, with a weekly call.⁷ The first three months are committed; after that it runs monthly with 30 days’ notice, and paying annually takes 10% off.⁴ Extra pages, placements and page templates are priced separately, and publisher fees and ad spend are on top.⁷

2. Siege Media

Siege Media is a content and GEO agency covering content strategy and creation, digital PR, affiliate partnerships, Reddit marketing and research reports. Its CEO, Ross Hudgens, wrote a book on generative engine optimization published by Wiley.⁸8 Source: Siege Media, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements; case-study figures reported by the agency. Its GEO method mixes original research and PR, bottom-of-funnel pages, a disclosed Reddit presence, affiliate placements and content refreshes through a tool called DataFlywheel.⁹9 Source: Siege Media, “GEO”, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements on method, phases and fit. By its own figures, Zapier gained $6.1M in traffic value and reached 96% LLM visibility, and Instacart earned 46.5k LLM citations.⁸

AI and review: BlueprintIQ, an internal engine clients do not log into, analyzes competitors and the client’s site, flags posts to refresh or remove and generates briefs. Content strategists QA and refine those briefs, and Siege says there is a human check before any update goes live.¹⁰10 Source: Siege Media, “BlueprintIQ”, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements.

Ideal for: well-known brands in SaaS, fintech, travel, ecommerce and similar sectors that can use a constant supply of articles, studies and earned press.⁸

Strengths: research-led digital PR; affiliate relationships; a named AI tool with a stated review step; a phased plan from foundation (months 1 and 2) to compounding (month 4 on).⁹

Limits: no published prices; asks clients to commit to “a 6+ month horizon” and says it is not a fit for anyone who needs “results measured in weeks”; headline results are traffic value and LLM visibility, with less on pipeline; the wide service mix can mean paying for content or PR beyond what you need.⁸⁹

Price: not published. The site offers a proposal or a free assessment.⁹

3. Breaking B2B

Breaking B2B works with “B2B and SaaS only” and says more than 50 B2B SaaS companies use it.¹¹11 Source: Breaking B2B, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements; case-study figures reported by the agency. Its menu runs from technical work, content and links to conversion, Reddit and YouTube, with AI search sold as AEO, GEO and LLM SEO. Each engagement starts with a 90-day revenue plan, and the agency says it is “senior-led” with no juniors.¹¹ It reports that Fibbler grew organic traffic about 10x in a few months and that VerifyTreatment went from 5 to 32 organic demos a month.¹¹

AI and review: its site describes AI search as a service it sells, not how AI is used in its own research or production. Senior staff run every account, the agency says, so the people on the sales call do the work.¹¹

Ideal for: B2B software firms that judge search on pipeline and want video and Reddit run alongside it.¹¹

Strengths: seven published tiers with stated keyword and prompt counts and link credits; senior-led delivery; a 90-day plan; a broad channel range.¹¹¹²12 Source: Breaking B2B, “Pricing”, accessed Nov 2026. List prices, according to the company. The page labels crossed-out figures as 6-month prices.

Limits: it does not explain how it uses AI in its own work, the main criterion in this guide; B2B SaaS focus leaves out ecommerce and consumer brands; the entry tier requires a full year; fuller AI search work is reserved for pricier tiers; published results are traffic and demo counts, with no timeframe given for VerifyTreatment.¹¹¹²

Price: Light from $4,600 a month on a 12-month term, then Silver $6,000, Gold $8,000, Growth Team $9,000, Diamond $10,200 and Aggressive Growth $15,200, on 6- or 12-month terms; Category King from $20,000 a month, scoped on a call. Crossed-out prices are labeled as 6-month rates, so the displayed ones appear to be 12-month rates; confirm before signing.¹²

4. Graphite

Graphite sells AEO, SEO and performance marketing. Its stated mission is that “our AI research team identifies the 5% of strategies that drive impact,” and its team includes a Chief AI Officer with a PhD.¹³13 Source: Graphite, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements; case-study figures reported by the agency. It publishes research, such as a June 2026 study on n8n, which it says gets 9% of its conversions through AEO.¹³

Its AEO service builds a fixed benchmark of usually more than 200 prompts a quarter from sales calls, Reddit threads and help center questions, and covers content, brand sentiment in AI answers, technical AEO and offsite work.¹⁴14 Source: Graphite, “AEO”, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements. Its case studies say Webflow doubled sign-ups from LLMs, Fourthwall grew search revenue 936% in nine months, and BetterUp’s monthly organic traffic grew from 74K to 3.8M.¹³

AI and review: the agency analyzes data from a tracking tool and says it layers on “manual tracking to get logged-in, accurate data” for money prompts. It does not describe AI-drafted content or which models it uses.¹⁴

Ideal for: large and mid-sized brands whose organic program is already established and who want evidence behind each AEO call.¹³

Strengths: an in-house research team with published studies; a fixed quarterly prompt benchmark; manual checks on high-value prompts; sentiment, technical and offsite work in one service.¹³¹⁴

Limits: no published prices; methods are described as “grounded in evidence” without detail on tools; case studies are mostly large consumer and software brands; performance marketing in the same scope can blur the search focus.¹³¹⁴

Price: not published. Scoping starts with a “Talk To Us” call.¹⁴

5. Radyant

Radyant is a Berlin-based agency that calls itself “AI-native,” focused on SEO, AI search and digital PR.¹⁵15 Source: Radyant, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements and list prices; case-study figures reported by the agency. Its live services are AI search optimization, daily prompt monitoring, brand perception checks and AI bot log analysis; SEO strategy, CRO, programmatic SEO, content production and digital PR are listed as coming soon.¹⁵

Attribution is the centerpiece: a GA4 channel group for AI platforms, a required “How did you hear about us?” field sorted into the CRM, and a “Verbal Source” CRM field from sales calls.¹⁵ Radyant reports that Heyflow tripled its MRR pipeline in six months and that a 247-page programmatic cluster for Planeco Building drove more than 60 leads in under six months.¹⁵

AI and review: Radyant built its own platform, the Radyant Cockpit, and a “context layer” of a superprompt, editorial rules and pre-publish checks. Citations are tracked in Peec AI, a third-party tool.¹⁵

Ideal for: European software and B2B sellers, especially in the DACH region, that want tracking in place before any page is published.¹⁵

Strengths: a detailed attribution setup tied to the CRM; written editorial rules and pre-publish checks around AI output; euro prices on the site; a free initial audit.¹⁵

Limits: content production and programmatic SEO are marked as coming soon even though a case study cites programmatic results, so confirm what is available now; a 12-month commitment with opt-out only after six months; most clients are European.¹⁵

Price: projects from €10,000; the Growth Partnership from €7,000 a month, with a 12-month commitment and an opt-out after six months. The first audit is free.¹⁵

6. Known

Known plans Google, AI answers and the outside sites those answers cite as “one search market, strategy and team.”¹⁶16 Source: Known, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Company statements. It starts with a free competitive benchmark, works on “the top 10% of opportunities first,” and reports progress as share of that market against competitors. The same team builds search software, including Byword and Mentions, which it says has more than 175,000 users.¹⁶

AI and review: senior experts are “supported by engineers, software, data and proprietary systems,” the company says. The site does not describe which tasks the software does or how output is checked.¹⁶

Ideal for: companies that want one plan across Google, AI answers and third-party sources, reported as market share.¹⁶

Strengths: one plan for all three surfaces; a free benchmark; a software team behind the strategists; it says it will tell prospects when search is not worth it.¹⁶

Limits: the site names no clients and shows no case studies; no prices; deliverables are not listed (Known says it does not sell fixed deliverables); no target industries named, so fit is hard to judge before a call.¹⁶

Price: not published. Scope and price follow the free analysis.¹⁶

7. GrowthX

GrowthX presents itself as a platform, a “closed loop system” that connects buyer questions, pages and results.¹⁷17 Source: GrowthX, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Company statements; case-study figures reported by the company. Its loop runs from context (company, audience, voice) and a record of SEO, AEO and page data to strategy, which maps the buyer questions a company can win, then action and learning. In the action step, AI agents produce briefs, drafts and optimized content, which your team can “guide and improve,” with built-in grading.¹⁷

Its logos include Brex, Ramp, Lovable, Airbyte, Strapi and Outreach, and the platform was built by experts who “learned from 100+ customers.” A case study headline says Exec increased LLM referrals 46x.¹⁷

AI and review: agents draft and grade; your team guides them; specialist support comes on top, which a customer quoted on the site calls an “expert-in-the-loop model.”¹⁷

Ideal for: software and AI scale-ups that employ writers and want them to ship more pages per month.¹⁷

Strengths: buyer question mapping across the funnel; agent-written briefs and drafts with grading before publishing; one reporting view for SEO, AEO and page performance.¹⁷

Limits: no published prices; it is a product your team operates, so execution is shared rather than done for you; links, mentions and community work are not described; published customers are almost all B2B software.¹⁷

Price: not published. Quotes follow a demo.¹⁷

8. AirOps

AirOps is a software platform that “combines agents, data, brand governance, and expertise” for AI search, with Webflow, Ramp and Carta among the logos on its homepage.¹⁸18 Source: AirOps, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Company statements. It launched Quill, its “AI agent captain,” in May 2026, and Offsite, which finds the third-party sources that shape AI answers and runs on the platform or as a managed service, in June.¹⁹19 Source: AirOps, “The Next Chapter for AirOps” (Quill announcement), accessed Nov 2026. Dated May 13, 2026. ²⁰20 Source: AirOps, “Introducing AirOps Offsite”, accessed Nov 2026. Dated June 11, 2026. In September it announced AirOps Services: channel experts who set strategy and execute it with the client across owned and external content, AI ads, community and social.²¹21 Source: AirOps, “The next chapter for AirOps: AirOps Services”, accessed Nov 2026. Dated September 2, 2026; results reported by the company.

AirOps reports that Webflow’s ChatGPT-attributed sign-ups grew from 2% to nearly 10%, with an SEO team that kept approval over output before it went live, and that LegalZoom cut $750K a year in production costs.²²22 Source: AirOps, Webflow case study, accessed Nov 2026. Results reported by the company. ²¹

AI and review: agents and workflows do the production and refreshes; the customer’s team keeps editorial approval, as in the Webflow case; Quill decides “when to bring your team into the loop,” which the launch post does not spell out further.¹⁹²²

Ideal for: large in-house content teams that want a production and refresh engine, with outside experts added only if needed.¹⁸²¹

Strengths: agents, workflows and brand governance in one product; offsite placements with a managed option; services that reach into ads, community and social.²¹²⁰

Limits: it is software first, so using the services means adopting the platform; your staff still does much of the work; Pro, Enterprise and services prices are not published; workflows need setup and ongoing review.²³23 Source: AirOps, “Pricing”, accessed Nov 2026. List prices, according to the company. ²¹

Price: Solo is free for one user and 35,000 tasks a month; Pro allows 100,000 tasks and unlimited seats; Enterprise is custom. Pro and Enterprise show no dollar price, and services are scoped on a call.²³

6. Pricing models compared

Model	Who uses it here	What you get	What to check
Tiered retainer with published output	Reach AI, Breaking B2B	Pages, placements and tracked prompts per month	Minimum term, extras billed outside the fee
Published floor, scope on a call	Radyant	A starting figure in euros	Commitment length and opt-out date
Quote only	Siege Media, Graphite, Known	A proposal after an assessment	Everything above, in writing
Software subscription plus services	GrowthX, AirOps	A platform your team runs, with experts on top	Who does the work, and the total of seats plus services

Sources: provider pricing and service pages cited in chapter 5.

For a done-for-you service, the useful comparison is cost per reviewed output over the first quarter. At list price, Reach AI’s Core Engine is $24,000 for its three-month minimum, for 30 pages and 18 placements.⁷ Breaking B2B’s Gold tier is also $8,000 a month, with six link credits a month, but on a 6- or 12-month term.¹² Radyant’s partnership is at least €84,000 over a full year, or €42,000 if you leave at the six-month opt-out.¹⁵

For a platform, the subscription is only part of the cost; the rest is your team’s time to set up workflows and review what the agents produce. AirOps’ free Solo plan is a fair way to see how much review the output needs.²³

7. Choosing a provider

Questions for every provider

1. Show me the AI in your process. A live walk-through of what the software does and what it produced for a client like you.
2. Who reviews the output? A role and seniority for whoever approves pages, briefs and outreach, and whether you sign off first.
3. What is in the fee? Pages, placements, technical fixes and community work per month, and what is billed on top.
4. What will you report? Pipeline or revenue from the CRM, reporting strict and influenced figures separately.

Add one technical question. Vercel’s crawler analysis showed that ChatGPT’s and Claude’s crawlers fetch JavaScript files but do not run them, so content rendered only in the browser is invisible to them.²⁴24 Source: Vercel, “The rise of the AI crawler”, accessed Nov 2026. Published December 2024. Ask who checks and fixes this.

For the strategy behind any of these programs, see the complete guide to B2B SEO in 2026.

Red flags

• An AI story that ends at a writing tool. Quicker drafts built on the old research win nothing new.
• No named reviewer. If nobody can say who checks AI output, assume nobody does.²
• Page counts with no quality gate. Mass output with no added value is exactly what Google’s spam policy describes.³
• Long terms before any evidence. Twelve months is a long time to wait for the first useful report.
• Results with no method. Ask how each case-study figure was attributed, and over what period.

If you are comparing agencies for a specific market, see the best B2B SEO services and the best SaaS SEO services.

8. The verdict

Pick an AI SEO service by its review step, then by its research. Software that covers more queries than people could, checked by senior staff, gives you scale without the spam risk. Reach AI takes first place because it describes that split most plainly, executes from content to community and publishes prices and terms; it is expensive and young. Siege Media suits large content programs, Breaking B2B suits SaaS teams that want published tiers, and GrowthX and AirOps suit teams with editors to run software.

Frequently asked questions

What is an AI SEO service?

An SEO provider that uses AI for part of the work, such as research, briefs, drafts, refreshes and monitoring. The term also covers optimizing for AI answers in ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews. The better providers do both and keep people responsible for strategy and the final check.

Is AI-generated SEO content against Google’s rules?

No, not by itself. Google says generative AI can help with research but that all AI-generated content should be fact-checked and reviewed by hand, and it counts mass-generated pages that give users nothing extra as spam.³² The risk is volume without review.

Can AI replace an SEO agency?

Software can take over much of the research and first drafts. People still choose which queries are worth winning, check facts and tone, and earn mentions on other sites. Platforms like GrowthX and AirOps hand that work to your staff; services firms keep it in-house.

How much do AI SEO services cost?

Published retainers in this guide start at $4,600 a month (Breaking B2B, 12-month term), with Reach AI at $8,000 and $15,000, Radyant from €7,000 and Breaking B2B’s top tier from $20,000.⁷¹²¹⁵ Siege Media, Graphite, Known and GrowthX quote on a call. AirOps has a free software tier, with paid plans and services priced on request.²³

How long until results show?

Reach AI expects early results in month 2 and enough data for a pipeline estimate after month 3, while Siege Media asks for a horizon of six months or more.⁴⁹ Treat any fixed promise with caution.

Sources and notes

1. Source: G2, “In the Answer Economy, Don’t Win the Click, Win the Answer”, accessed Nov 2026. Survey of 1,076 B2B software buyers, March 2026. ↩

2. Source: Google Search Central, “Google Search’s guidance on using generative AI content on your website”, accessed Nov 2026. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

3. Source: Google Search Central, “Spam policies for Google web search”, accessed Nov 2026. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

4. Reach AI, homepage FAQ (usereach.ai), accessed Oct 2026. Company statements, including contract terms; the pricing page FAQ did not display its answer on contract length when rechecked in November. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸

5. Reach AI, homepage (usereach.ai), accessed Nov 2026. Company statements. ↩ ↩² ↩³

6. Reach AI, “Customer Results” (usereach.ai/customer-results), accessed Oct 2026. Results reported by the company, not independently verified. ↩ ↩²

7. Reach AI, “Pricing” (usereach.ai/pricing), accessed Nov 2026. List prices, according to the company. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶

8. Source: Siege Media, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements; case-study figures reported by the agency. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

9. Source: Siege Media, “GEO”, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements on method, phases and fit. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

10. Source: Siege Media, “BlueprintIQ”, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements. ↩

11. Source: Breaking B2B, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements; case-study figures reported by the agency. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷

12. Source: Breaking B2B, “Pricing”, accessed Nov 2026. List prices, according to the company. The page labels crossed-out figures as 6-month prices. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

13. Source: Graphite, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements; case-study figures reported by the agency. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶

14. Source: Graphite, “AEO”, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

15. Source: Radyant, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Agency statements and list prices; case-study figures reported by the agency. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹

16. Source: Known, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Company statements. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷

17. Source: GrowthX, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Company statements; case-study figures reported by the company. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹

18. Source: AirOps, homepage, accessed Nov 2026. Company statements. ↩ ↩²

19. Source: AirOps, “The Next Chapter for AirOps” (Quill announcement), accessed Nov 2026. Dated May 13, 2026. ↩ ↩²

20. Source: AirOps, “Introducing AirOps Offsite”, accessed Nov 2026. Dated June 11, 2026. ↩ ↩²

21. Source: AirOps, “The next chapter for AirOps: AirOps Services”, accessed Nov 2026. Dated September 2, 2026; results reported by the company. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

22. Source: AirOps, Webflow case study, accessed Nov 2026. Results reported by the company. ↩ ↩²

23. Source: AirOps, “Pricing”, accessed Nov 2026. List prices, according to the company. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵

24. Source: Vercel, “The rise of the AI crawler”, accessed Nov 2026. Published December 2024. ↩